lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 8 Apr 2012 23:15:07 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts


On Apr 8, 2012, at 6:45 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> On 04/08/2012 03:46 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> What if it turns out we can make udev/devtmpfs make this happen
>>> transparently (which it sounds like it might be possible)?  Would you be
>>> okay with removing the "implicit bind mount" property of the current
>>> devpts then?
>> 
>> Once we get to the point where it "just works" I'm quite happy for that
>> to happen unless it turns out there's any large code size/performance
>> hits in having the feature always on. I don't see any.
>> 
> 
> No, it's actually the other way around... it lets us take some pretty
> nice shortcuts.

If it requires making changes to udev, can we place make sure have
a decent amount of time before we remove code from the kernel? 
I really hate it when people break userspace for the convenience
of kernel programmers.   As I recall Linus had something to say
about that….

-- Ted


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ