linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio_blk: use disk_name_format() to support mass of disks naming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:33:50 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Ren Mingxin <renmx@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	VIRTUAL <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio_blk: use disk_name_format() to support mass
 of disks naming

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:47:51AM +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
>  On 04/04/2012 04:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:00:45PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:56:18AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >>>So if we're agreed no other devices going forwards should ever use this
> >>>interface, is there any point unifying the interface?  No matter how
> >>>many caveats you hedge it round with, putting the API in a central place
> >>>will be a bit like a honey trap for careless bears.   It might be safer
> >>>just to leave it buried in the three current drivers.
> >>Yeah, that was my hope but I think it would be easier to enforce to
> >>have a common function which is clearly marked legacy so that new
> >>driver writers can go look for the naming code in the existing ones,
> >>find out they're all using the same function which is marked legacy
> >>and explains what to do for newer drivers.
> >I think I'm not the only one to be confused about the
> >preferred direction here.
> >James, do you agree to the approach above?
> >
> >It would be nice to fix virtio block for 3.4, so
> >how about this:
> >- I'll just apply the original bugfix patch for 3.4 -
> >   it only affects virtio
> 
> Sorry, about only affects virtio, I'm not very clear here:
> 1) Just duplicate the disk name format function in virtio_blk
>     like the original patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/28/45
> 2) Move the disk name format function into block core like
>     this patch series but only affects virtio(not affect mtip32xx).
> Do you mean the 2) one or something else?

I mean 1) - I'll apply the original patch.

> >- Ren will repost the refactoring patch on top, and we can
> >   keep up the discussion
> >
> >Ren if you agree, can you make this a two patch series please?
> >
> 
> Sure.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Ren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/