linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:31:54 +0300
From:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@...il.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 4/5/2012 2:53 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > This patch doesn't update all cpuidle device registrations. I will do that
> 
> question is if you want to do per cpu latencies, or if you want to have
> both types of C state in one big table, and have each of the tegra cpyu
> types pick half of them...
> 

How would the governor then know which C states belong to which CPUs?

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/