linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:12:29 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:55:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Changes since 20120405:
> 
> New trees: sh-current, sh
> 
> The tile tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
> 
> The net-next tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The wireless-next tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.
> 
> The trivial tree lost its conflict.

The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20120405.

> The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20120405.
> 
> The pinctrl tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
> next-20120403.
> 
> The akpm tree lost several patches that turned up in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped