linux-kernel - Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:30:14 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:55:41PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 04:53 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > That all seems pretty simple.
> > 
> >>   - get rid of the (rather broken) idea of 'legacy' vs 'non-legacy mode'
> >>     mount options in the default setup; I don't think userspace should
> >>     ever be required to fiddle with such stuff
> > 
> > Hm, but if we get rid of them, what about tools that expect them to be
> > there?  Just silently ignore them?
> > 
> 
> Drop the newinstance mount option on the floor; keep recognizing the
> ptmxmode mount option but change the default.

Wait, change the default to what?

I think this is going to require a lot of testing :)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/