linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: Sort Kconfig entries for mfd drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:35:48 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Sort Kconfig entries for mfd drivers

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com> wrote:

> Sort Kconfig entries by chip vendor name first, then driver name.
> Having the Kconfig entries sorted makes it easier for users to find the
> driver they want to enable.
> This change also encourages new coming drivers to be put in proper location
> rather than to be added at random location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> ---
> Hi Samuel,
> I generate this patch against linux-next 20120411.
> If you think this patch is ok, pls apply this one and
> ignore my previous patch "mfd: Move MFD_TPS65090 and
> TPS65911_COMPARATOR Kconfig entries to proper location".

This is going to cause a number of merge conflicts for upcoming
patches from my side, I'd really like this to go into the -rc:s
if accepted so I can rely on it being present as a merge base.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/