linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RESEND] do not redefine userspace's NULL #define

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:39:20 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] do not redefine userspace's NULL #define

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@...e.cz> wrote:
> GCC's NULL is actually __null, which allows detecting some questionable
> NULL usage and warn about it. Moreover each platform/compiler should have
> its own stddef.h anyway (which is different from linux/stddef.h).
> So there's no good reason to override what the compiler provides.
> Keep the #define conditionally, in order to keep the headers self-contained.

There's no way user should ever include the linux internal stddef.h.

And quite frankly, kernel-external definitions of NULL have
traditionally been pure sh*t (ie plain "0" without the cast to a
pointer), so I'm not entirely convinced about this patch.

So what is the *actual* thing this helps with?

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/