linux-kernel - Re: [3.4-rc3] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:36:00 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3.4-rc3] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, this builds. I'll run with this for a while, and see what falls out.

So assuming that works and doesn't have some silly thinko in it, I
think it is a worthwhile addition to the whole stack debugging thing.
Right now, the message about "process xyz used most stack, x bytes
free" really is pretty useless. If it were to actually show "hey, this
was the deepest actual stack chain", that sounds quite interesting.

Of course, if the stack is largely used by some leaf function that
just has a big stack frame, that won't show up in the stack trace, but
that's presumably not the worst worry. And hopefully the caller of
that would still be pretty deep and show up without having been
overwritten.

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/