linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] sched: steer waking task to empty cfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:37:43 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched: steer waking task to empty cfs_rq for better
 latencies

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2012-04-24 18:58:16]:

> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:26 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > Steer a waking task towards a cpu where its cgroup has zero tasks (in
> > order to provide it better sleeper credits and hence reduce its wakeup
> > latency). 
> 
> That's just vile.. pjt could you post your global vruntime stuff so
> vatsa can have a go at that?

The workload I am up against does experience tons of wakeup (after very short 
(microsecond range) bursts of sleeps) and so am skeptical how the global 
vruntime would keep up with this kind of workload. I'd be happy to test patches 
and give feedback!

- vatsa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/