linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: sm7xx: code improvements and cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:05:42 +0200
From:	Javier Muñoz <jmunhoz@...lia.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	gewang@...iconmotion.com, boyod.yang@...iconmotion.com.cn,
	wuzhangjin@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm7xx: code improvements and cleanup

On 04/25/2012 10:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:50:28PM +0200, Javier M. Mellid wrote:
>> This patch implements some code improvements and cleanup.
>>
>> New code uses dynamic debug support. Old debug calls updated/tested to
>> use this API.
>>
>> Cleanup on obsolete references, internal versions and some
>> comments. Dead code removal.
>>
>> Patch tested with SM712.
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> - Code improvements and cleanup
>> - Use dynamic debug support
>> - Remove out-of-date comments/references
>> - Remove dead code
> 
> Can you please break this down into individual patches, each doing only
> one thing, so that we can review it easier?  Otherwise, it's quite
> difficult, which is one reason why we require patches to be created this
> way.

Yes, of course.

Thanks!

Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/