| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:11:22 +0800 From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com> Cc: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>, b20223@...escale.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com, kernel@...gutronix.de, cjb@...top.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: add imx pinctrl core driver On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:11:04AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > except duplicate bindings instead having common one make no sense either > > so imx, at91 and ST (STB SoC and other does have the same type of pin IP > > to not come with a common bindig means we are doint the same crap as before > > with switch to DT > It can be every different in hardware details from one pin based controller to another. mxs pinctrl is another pin based IP, and Dong tried to approach a binding working good for both imx and mxs, but in the end we agree imx binding does not work so good for mxs, and vice versa. And that's why pinctrl core binding design leaves out the platform specific binding. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists