lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:11:08 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: How to handle function tracing, frame pointers and
	-mfentry?

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:50:28AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > 
> > I just measured and a null compile (nothing changes) of a current
> > tree calls "gcc" 141 times.
> Something is wrong then which must be fixed.
> There are 55 uses of cc-option in */x86/*
> And only 7 uses of cc-option in the top-level Makefile.
> 
> So it looks like we evalute the same assignmet twice or more.

"make defconfig" in my box calls gcc 50 times.
This looks much closer to the actual usage of cc-option in the
above mentioned files.
How did you manage to achieve 144 calls to gcc?

Any specific configuration that triggers this?

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ