[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 14:53:09 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Pierre Carrier <pierre@...tify.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] procfs: expose umask in stat and status
Hi Pierre,
On Sat, 5 May 2012 04:50:27 +0200 Pierre Carrier <pierre@...tify.com> wrote:
>
> + umask = get_task_umask(p);
> + if (umask >= 0)
> + seq_printf(m, "Umask:\t0%o\n", umask);
Why not use "Umask:\t%#o\n" ? that way you don't get two zeros if the
umask is zero.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists