linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] do not use s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 May 2012 17:58:17 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
Cc:	MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] do not use s_dirt in JFFS2

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Brian Norris
<computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 20:27 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>> This patch-set makes JFFS2 file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()'
>>> call-back because I plan to remove it once all users are gone.
>>
>> I'd really appreciate if someone on the MTD list tested these patches.
>
> Am I crazy, or did you send the cover letter without the patches?

Sorry, I am at least a little crazy: I actually see two patches
(labelled 1/2 and 2/2) while the cover is labelled 0/3, with a
diffstat from FAT changes...

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/