linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] broken TASK_SIZE for ia32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 06 May 2012 16:48:00 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] broken TASK_SIZE for ia32_aout

Why not just make it illegal to make the system calls you don't care about then, to prevent any security issue?

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

>From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:51:30 -0700
>
>> No.  The input layer exports pointers in structures on the
>> read/write paths, and bitmasks encoded in ASCII strings which depend
>> on sizeof(long).  The stupid... it burns...
>
>So there has to be a hack in every userland application wherein we
>teach it no only about this issue, but add special code to teach it
>how to make 64-bit system call traps.
>
>FOR EVERY CPU TYPE?
>
>I'd rather wait for a newer less broken input API to be added, rather
>than go through the pain of having to support 64-bit system calls in
>32-bit apps.
>
>Nobody on sparc has noticed this yet, and I doubt anyone is going to
>care meanwhile.

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/