linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] HID: hid-multitouch: fix wrong protocol detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 May 2012 21:56:32 +0200
From:	"Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] HID: hid-multitouch: fix wrong protocol detection

> > Why not skip the pointer here?
> 
> well, the idea was to keep the memory footprint low. As these values
> are only needed at init, then I freed them once I finished using them.
> I can of course skip the pointer, but in that case, wouldn't the
> struct declaration be worthless?

My bad, I misread the placement of the free() statement. I was also
concerned about memory, since HID is big enough a memory hog as it
is. Barring the added complexity of this patch, it now makes more
sense.

    Acked-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>

Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/