lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 10:04:56 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	suresh@...stanetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] coredump: flush the fpu exit state for proper
 multi-threaded core dump

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> My point was, there is no any guarantee prepare_to_copy() does the flush.
> An architecture can do this in copy_thread() or arch_dup_task_struct(),
> for example. In fact I do not understand why x86 doesn't do this.

I agree that it would actually make more sense to do in
arch_dup_task_struct(). I had trouble finding where the heck the
fork() code did the FPU fixes back when I was fighting the FPU
corruption thing.

The prepare_to_copy() thing is, I think, purely historical, and I
think we should in fact get rid of it. Everybody else makes it a
no-op, I think, with a *few* exceptions that seem to have copied the
x86 model of flushing the FPU there.

So if somebody sends me a patch to remove that thing, and move the few
existing users to arch_dup_task_struct(), I'd take it.

I think it would be a mistake to use it in the exit path. Make an
explicit "drop_thread_state()" or similar macro, which can undo FPU
state and possibly other architecture state.

                       Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ