linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: add DT clock binding support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 May 2012 08:40:01 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: add DT clock binding support

On 05/01/2012 05:59 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> On 20120409-15:25, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> snip
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt   |  117 ++++++++++++++++
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt      |   22 +++
>>  drivers/clk/clk.c                                  |  140 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/clk/clkdev.c                               |   77 +++++++++++
>>  include/linux/clk-provider.h                       |   14 ++
>>  include/linux/clk.h                                |   19 +++
>>  6 files changed, 389 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> Patches 1 & 2 are trivial and certainly aimed at clk-next, so I've taken
> them in.  This patch is a bit more difficult as it touches the common
> clk code, clkdev/clk.h and some DT docs.
> 
> Are you looking for me to take this patch into clk-next?  I'm just
> trying to avoid any more clk dependency issues than we already have...
> 

I think that makes the most sense as it appears I'm dependent on
clk-next now. I'm rebasing my patches on clk-next now.

Rob

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/