lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 09:53:38 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Joel Reardon <joel@...mbassador.com>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: determining if a block erasure failed

I want the caller of erase_worker() to be aware if the erase block became
bad. Here is the relevant code at the end of erase_worker():

/* at this time, the erase has failed. err == -EIO */
        ubi_msg("mark PEB %d as bad", pnum);
        err = ubi_io_mark_bad(ubi, pnum);
        if (err)
                goto out_ro;

/* does other stuff, not touching err */

/* err == 0 here, because of above goto */
        return err;

out_ro:
        ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
        return err;


So, if this function should return zero when the erase block fails, then I
will add a "result" field to ubi_work that will store the result of the
work function. But I figured I'd check first if the return err that always
returns 0 is not an oversight and this function should return -EIO if it
fails.

cheers,
Joel Reardon

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ