linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] UBI: add lnum to struct ubi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 May 2012 14:14:58 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Joel Reardon <joel@...mbassador.com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] UBI: add lnum to struct ubi_work

On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 20:47 +0200, Joel Reardon wrote:
> @@ -1086,13 +1090,14 @@ out_ro:
>   * @ubi: UBI device description object
>   * @pnum: physical eraseblock to return
>   * @torture: if this physical eraseblock has to be tortured
> + * @lnum: the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB
>   *
>   * This function is called to return physical eraseblock @pnum to the pool of
>   * free physical eraseblocks. The @torture flag has to be set if an I/O error
>   * occurred to this @pnum and it has to be tested. This function returns zero
>   * in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure.
>   */
> -int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
> +int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture, int lnum)

Joel, am sorry for nitpicking again, but could you please put the "lnum"
argument between "ubi" and "lnum" instead? Just feels more natural.
Otherwise the patch is OK. Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)