linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] vfs: atomic open v5 (part 1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 May 2012 22:39:38 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] vfs: atomic open v5 (part 1)

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>> This is part 1 of the atomic open series.  The second part is also ready for
>> review and I'll post it once this first part is accepted.
>
> You should probably double-check against my vfs (especially dentry)
> cleanups that I just merged and pushed out.
>
> I think they all are at a lower level than your patches, and won't
> affect any of them, but I thought I'd mention it just in case, since
> my patch-series also touches fs/namei.c (but it's really just because
> of __d_lookup_rcu() calling convention changes, and think all of your
> patches are for the later phases)

Yes, I checked and they are independent.

I found some issues with the dentry_cmp() code and your changes which
I'll post separately.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/