| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:21:11 +0200 From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> Cc: zheng.z.yan@...el.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, andi@...stfloor.org, ming.m.lin@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] perf, tool: uncore related changes On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:53:13PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> Jiri, >> >> Is there a way with the current parser to have a syntax as follows: >> >> perf stat -e cpu/event=cycles,edge/ ... >> >> In other words, avoid juggling between -e cycles and the -e >> cpu/event=.../ syntax? > Also with this new syntax, how am I supposed to request precise sampling? perf stat -e cpu/event=cycles,edge,precise=1/ > I think it's possible.. so far we have the cpu/event=../ term in use for number > assignment. We could do string translation to appropriate values.. I'll check > > added to my todo list ;) > > jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists