| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:07:38 +0200 From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: 3.4+ tty lockdep trace On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: >> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:24:56 +0200 >> Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote: >> > >> > And here is the second one attached as well, so these are two >> > different warnings I get with the new version. >> >> >> I'm somewhat baffled by this one. Can lockdep be fooled by an object >> being freed and reallocated at the same address, Is there any markup >> that should be present to avoid that ? > > Sasha, > > Did you apply Ming's second patch. His first patch (the one referenced > in the email) didn't have the unlock fixup. Nope, I just got the first one. What's the right patchset to use atm? I know about these patches from Ming, and I see Alan sent out two patches yesterday. Which ones should I use for testing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists