linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 11:20:19 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
	x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel
 machines

On Fri, 25 May 2012, Chen Gong wrote:

> 于 2012/5/25 14:24, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:54:52PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Intentionally left blank to be filled out by someone who wants
> >> that and can explain the reason for this better than me.
> > 
> > That'll be Intel folk :)
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > 
> > Looks good to me too, thanks Thomas for doing this!
> > 
> > I'll run it next week just in case.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
> > 
> 
> Oh, Oh, wait. First I need to thank Thomas to improve it. I don't
> reply you at the first time because I have some thoughts and now
> I'm testing it. The basic test shows it hangs the system after
> sb_edac is removed and when error count increases to the threshold
> it hangs again, and when trying to reboot the system no hang happnes
> (not reach the threshold) the system oops. I need to time to debug
> and give the valid feedback. Please be patient :-). Of course,

As I said it's completely untested. I just made sure it compiles :)