linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 May 2012 10:40:32 +0800
From:	Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Interesting posts, first the "500K scheduler" nonsense now
> printk nonsense?

printk nonsense?  You actually read my words wrong(LAUGH!)
[I m going to quota my post]
* Chen <hi3766691@...il.com> wrote:
> Everyone knows that this patch had been unstable. Also, too
> much code are pushed into printk() with the patch
>
I mean that too much code are brought with the patch.

500K scheduler is true. 248K(Core.c[MODULAR]) + 148K(fair.c[CFS]) +
47K(rt.c[RT])  = 443K.(Does not include the other source files of
scheduler.) It is really a *HUGE* CPU scheduler.[But it doesn't bring
much advantages to desktop!!]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/