linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 4/8] arm-soc: clock driver changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 May 2012 12:53:34 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	arm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/8] arm-soc: clock driver changes

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>>
>>  151 files changed, 8310 insertions(+), 14192 deletions(-)
>
> Judging by the diffstat, I think we resolved this differently.
>
> I also removed the
>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>
> from mach-kirkwood/common.c, since the OF users all got removed. You
> have one less lines deleted than I do, which makes me think you didn't
> remove that header file include.
>
> But I didn't actually check. I thought I'd mention it, just so that it
> doesn't come back (or, assuming I did the wrong thing, you fix it up
> and put it back)

Good catch. Yes, I did indeed keep it and there is no need to do so
since it was only used in the code that got removed. Your resolution
is good. Thanks for the heads up.


Regards,

-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/