linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] mm: vmalloc: add VM_DMA flag to indicate areas used by dma-mapping framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 May 2012 11:07:14 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	"'KOSAKI Motohiro'" <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	"'Paul Mundt'" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	"'Minchan Kim'" <minchan@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"'Kyungmin Park'" <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	"'Arnd Bergmann'" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"'Russell King - ARM Linux'" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"'Chunsang Jeong'" <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
	"'Krishna Reddy'" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
	"'Hiroshi Doyu'" <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
	"'Subash Patel'" <subashrp@...il.com>,
	"'Nick Piggin'" <npiggin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] mm: vmalloc: add VM_DMA flag to indicate areas
 used by dma-mapping framework

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:19:39AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sunday, May 27, 2012 2:35 PM KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:26:12PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > >> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 9:08 AM Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >> > Hmm, VM_DMA would become generic flag?
> > >> > AFAIU, maybe VM_DMA would be used only on ARM arch.
> > >>
> > >> Right now yes, it will be used only on ARM architecture, but maybe other architecture will
> > >> start using it once it is available.
> > >>
> > > There's very little about the code in question that is ARM-specific to
> > > begin with. I plan to adopt similar changes on SH once the work has
> > > settled one way or the other, so we'll probably use the VMA flag there,
> > > too.
> > 
> > I don't think VM_DMA is good idea because x86_64 has two dma zones. x86 unaware
> > patches make no sense.
> 
> I see no problems to add VM_DMA64 later if x86_64 starts using vmalloc areas for creating 
> kernel mappings for the dma buffers (I assume that there are 2 dma zones: one 32bit and one
> 64bit). Right now x86 and x86_64 don't use vmalloc areas for dma buffers, so I hardly see
> how this patch can be considered as 'x86 unaware'.

Well they do - kind off. It is usually done by calling vmalloc_32 and then using
the DMA API on top of those pages (or sometimes the non-portable virt_to_phys macro).

Introducing this and replacing the vmalloc_32 with this seems like a nice step in making
those device drivers APIs more portable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/