linux-kernel - Re: Use of high-res timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 23:26:24 +0800
From:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jcm@...masters.org
Subject: Re: Use of high-res timers

>
> No. ktime_get() is guaranteed to be monotonic across CPUs.
>

Hi,

We probably need a tool to enable people to test it out. I'd like to
know if you would be interested in queuing up a tool
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/10/282) for 3.5.
I've pinged someone, but not sure they have extra bandwidth or still
have interests in it.

TIA.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/