linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to flexible proportions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:10:15 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Convert BDI proportion calculations to
 flexible proportions

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:42:06AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 01-06-12 00:26:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 00:11 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >  bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
> > >  {
> > > -       u64 events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > > +       u64 events;
> > > +       unsigned long flags;
> > >  
> > > +       local_irq_save(flags);
> > > +       events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > > +       local_irq_restore(flags);
> > >         /*
> > >          * Don't do anything if there are no events.
> > >          */
> > > @@ -73,7 +77,9 @@ bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
> > >         if (periods < 64)
> > >                 events -= events >> periods;
> > >         /* Use addition to avoid losing events happening between sum and set */
> > > +       local_irq_save(flags);
> > >         percpu_counter_add(&p->events, -events);
> > > +       local_irq_restore(flags);
> > >         p->period += periods;
> > >         write_seqcount_end(&p->sequence); 
> > 
> > Uhm, why bother enabling it in between? Just wrap the whole function in
> > a single IRQ disable.
>   I wanted to have interrupts disabled for as short as possible but if you
> think it doesn't matter, I'll take your advice. The result is attached.

Thank you! I applied this incremental fix next to the commit
"lib: Proportions with flexible period".

Thanks,
Fengguang

> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Subject: lib: Fix possible deadlock in flexible proportion code
> 
> When percpu counter function in fprop_new_period() is interrupted by an
> interrupt while holding counter lock, it can cause deadlock when the
> interrupt wants to take the lock as well. Fix the problem by disabling
> interrupts when calling percpu counter functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> 
> diff -u b/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> --- b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> +++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c
> @@ -62,13 +62,18 @@
>   */
>  bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
>  {
> -	u64 events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> +	u64 events;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't do anything if there are no events.
>  	 */
> -	if (events <= 1)
> +	if (events <= 1) {
> +		local_irq_restore(flags);
>  		return false;
> +	}
>  	write_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence);
>  	if (periods < 64)
>  		events -= events >> periods;
> @@ -76,6 +81,7 @@
>  	percpu_counter_add(&p->events, -events);
>  	p->period += periods;
>  	write_seqcount_end(&p->sequence);
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
>  	return true;
>  }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/