linux-kernel - Re: why the decompressed procedure move kernel from address 0x100000(1M) to 0x1000000(16M) +x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:10:08 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	hacklu <embedway.linux@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why the decompressed procedure move kernel from address 0x100000(1M)
 to 0x1000000(16M) +x

On 06/02/2012 04:48 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
On 06/02/2012 04:48 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> hacklu <embedway.linux@...il.com> writes:
> 
>> hi all,
>> recently, I got some puzzle when I read source code of the system boot. I need
>> some help.
>>
>> at the end of src/arch/x86/boot/header.S,  kernel jump to 0x100000(where is the
>> src/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S).
>> in __this__ head_32.S, I found the kernel is move to 0x1000000(mostly is to
>> here) +x. the x distance is used for decompressed buf.  must leave some distance
>> for decompressing without overlap.
>>
>> after the move, kernel is decompressed at 0x1000000(16m). and jump to it.
>>
>> so why not decompressed kernel at 0x100000(1M) to 0x1000000(16m) directly
>> without moving?
>>
>> is the move necessary?
> 
> The move is nececcessary if we are doing the decompression in place.
> Without a move it is hard to tell if there are going to be overlapping
> address problems.  The move is cheap so there is no apparent reason
> to optimize it away.
> 

Well, right now we do two copies (one before decompression, and one
after while parsing the ELF payload.)  It would be nice to get rid of at
least one but preferably both (when possible.)

Boot time does matter, although this isn't a huge amount of time, it is
something that can be shaved off relatively cheaply.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/