linux-kernel - RE: [RFC 2/6] remoteproc: Pass struct fw to load_segments and find_rsc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:58:23 +0200
From:	Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc:	Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...ricsson.com>,
	Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...ricsson.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC 2/6] remoteproc: Pass struct fw to load_segments and
 find_rsc_table.

> >> +       rproc->bootaddr = ehdr->e_entry;
> 
> We might want to dedicate this (humble) hunk its own handler, because
> I'm not sure it fits very well into rproc_find_rsc_table().

Sure, I can do this, but this whole thing is a bit obscure and I
didn't quite know what to do with it.

This value is not used anywhere in the upstream code. Couldn't we
just delete this, and you can add it when you upstream the code
where this is used?

Regards,
Sjur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/