| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 06:13:42 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> CC: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: menu: use nr_running instead of cpuload for calculating perf mult On 6/4/2012 3:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:24 +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote: >> rq->cpuload strongly depends on cgroup hierarchy. For example, if hundreds of >> tasks are running inside cpu:/test cgroup, the sum of cpuload over all cpus >> won't exceed 1024 (by default). That makes the cpuidle menu governor take wrong >> decisions, which can negatively affect overall performance. >> >> To cope this, use nr_running last seen in __update_cpu_load() instead of >> cpuload for calculating performance multiplier. > > What is cpuidle trying to do? what it is doing is trying to use "cpuload" as proxy for performance sensitivity. The higher the load, the longer the idle period (predicted) needs to be, for cpuidle to be willing to tolerate the latency of deeper C states. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists