[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:43:50 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zheng.z.yan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Fix Intel shared extra MSR allocation
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 12:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 12:35 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > Ok, I found the problem. It was in intel_fixup_er().
>> > Unlike in the original code, this routine must update
>> > the event->extra_reg.idx to the idx parameter instead
>> > of trying to swap out from it.
>>
>> Ah indeed. Thanks!
>
>
> static void intel_fixup_er(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
> {
> event->hw.extra_reg.idx = idx;
>
> if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_0) {
> event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
> event->hw.config |= 0x01b7;
> event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0;
> } else if (idx == EXTRA_REG_RSP_1) {
> event->hw.config &= ~INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK;
> event->hw.config |= 0x01bb;
> event->hw.extra_reg.reg = MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1;
> }
> }
>
> Like that then?
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists