[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:48:12 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 07:10:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > How about newer unknown Intel CPUs with arch_perfmon >= 3? Those would get
> > intel_pmu, correct? There's no guarantee that they support the trick.
>
> But they will have no PEBS constraints set, so effectively don't have
> PEBS.
Ok. I see you want to do it tricky instead of obvious.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists