linux-kernel - Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive tickless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:16:38 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
	Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"Luck,Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive
 tickless


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:07:09AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:19 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Ingo, Thomas,
> > > 
> > > This starts the basic code that allow accounting of cputime spent tickless
> > > outside idle, which is a first step to prepare for the adaptive nohz
> > > infrastructure.
> > > 
> > > I hope we can set a tree in -tip for that. If you're fine with it
> > > this is pullable from:
> > 
> > There's a number of architecture that already does fine grained
> > user/kernel time accounting on syscall boundaries etc.. s390, powerpc
> > and ia64.
> > 
> > You're now adding a 3rd way of accounting user/kernel time.. I'm not
> > much looking fwd to that..
> 
> You're right, I should have looked into CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING sooner
> and see if I can reuse it.
> 
> I'll try something with that.

Maybe sanitize all the variants under a single set of 
wrappers/callbacks?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/