linux-kernel - Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0700
From:	Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
To:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...nline.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward

Hi Hillf,

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>>
>> Hang at same place?
>>
> And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
>
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c        Sat Jun  2 17:30:28 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c        Thu Jun  7 20:58:36 2012
> @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
>                /* Update our root-domain */
>                grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
>                if (rq->rd) {
> -                       BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
> +                       BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>
>                        set_rq_online(rq);
>                }
> --

Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/