linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:41:46 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive
 spinlocks



On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
>> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
> 
> I understand your saying. Looks good.
> However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
> So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.

Greg, Alan,

any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/