[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:57:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 17:51 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I would also worry about the compiler being able to inline a function
> containing one of these, but that's a compiler thing, not a CPU type of
> thing.
You missed the beginning of the thread where we talked about the fact
that gcc will not put a mcount (or fentry) in an inlined function, so
that's not a worry.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists