linux-kernel - Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: chcpu/6197/0x00000002

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:24:56 +0200
From:	Thomas Sattler <sattler@....uni-frankfurt.de>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: chcpu/6197/0x00000002

> Any chance you could try a non-rt kernel,

Earlier in this thread I wrote, that 3.4.[23] are
in fact unaffected. Only 3.4.[234]-rt1[0123] show
this BUG in dmesg.

> to rule out an -rt issue?

Steven Rostedt wrote (w/o CC:LKML) that he believes
CPU hotplug is still an issue with -rt. So, are you
still interested to follow the "amd on intel" thing?

> Also, looks like your cpu can do 64-bit. Can you
> try a 64-bit kernel?

Yes, it's a 32-bit userland on 64-bit hardware. So
far I didn't compile 64-bit kernels on 32-bit user-
land but in case you're still interested in the
result, I'll give it a try.

> Also, what is the exact command line you're running
> with chcpu?

# chcpu --disable 1

Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/