lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:22:39 -0700
From:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, minchan@...il.com, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mel@....ul.ie,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 07/11] mm: make cache alignment code generic

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:57:11PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>  				/* Is this gap large enough? Remember it. */
>  				vma_start = max(vma->vm_prev->vm_end, lower_limit);
> +				vma_start = arch_align_addr(vma_start, filp,
> +						pgoff, flags, ALLOC_UP);
>  				if (vma->vm_start - len >= vma_start) {
>  					addr = vma_start;
>  					found_here = true;


So, right there you're losing the benefit of O(log N) allocations on these
vmas that require alignment. The rbtree lets you quickly find an allocation
that has the desired size, but you may see any number of them without ever
finding one that is large enough after alignment.

I wonder if one could go with a two-stage process:

1- figure out what gap size would guarantee a successful, aligned allocation.
basically it's desired size + desired alignment - PAGE_SIZE. See if you
can find a gap of that size, and carve your aligned allocation into it
if possible.

2- if that failed, look for all gaps of at least the desired size,
as you are proposing, and see if any of them is aligned enough for
your requirements.

This would possibly cause a bit more virtual address space fragmentation,
but I think this should still work ?

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ