linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: remove the now-redundant kref

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:05:53 +0300
From:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: remove the now-redundant kref

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:52:27AM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> Simplify the unregister/free interfaces, and make them easier
>> to understand and use, by moving to a symmetric and consistent
>> alloc() -> register() -> unregister() -> free() flow.
>
> The naming in the driver model is:
>
> alloc() -> add() -> del() -> put()
>
> where alloc() is an allocation + initialization, and
>
> register() -> unregister()
>
> where register() is initialization + add() and
> unregister() is del() + put().

I wasn't sure if it'd help to adopt the driver model's naming, but I
guess it just might do, so I'll do that.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/