| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:28:17 +0800 From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com> To: "devendra.aaru" <devendra.aaru@...il.com> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-mc13783: set platform data to NULL at mc13783_led_remove On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:10 AM, devendra.aaru <devendra.aaru@...il.com> wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > I Made all the necessary changes, and it touched 21 drivers overall, > and i compile tested all except leds-sunfire as i dont have a > cross-toolchain for that. > all patches are compile tested with > > gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3, ( my machine's) > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (crosstool-NG linaro-1.13.1-2012.05-20120523 - > Linaro GCC 2012.05) 4.7.1 20120514 (prerelease) (ARM toolchain's) > > at each cross-compile of a driver i selected the defconfig of each > machine, fox ex. for leds-netxbig i chose kirkwood-defconfig, and for > leds-s3c24xx i chose s3c2410_defconfig. > Very good, thanks a lot. > Now i have only 1 question in mind :). > > do i need to submit all in a single patch? or patch per driver? > I prefer to one patch per driver and please add the driver maintainers in you Cc list of each patch. -Bryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists