linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix panic in netprio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:10:14 +0800
From:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com, tj@...nel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix panic in netprio_cgroup

于 2012年07月05日 16:43, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 16:31 +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> we set max_prioidx to the first zero bit index of prioidx_map in
>> function get_prioidx.
>>
>> So when we delete the low index netprio cgroup and adding a new
>> netprio cgroup again,the max_prioidx will be set to the low index.
>>
>> when we set the high index cgroup's net_prio.ifpriomap,the function
>> write_priomap will call update_netdev_tables to alloc memory which
>> size is sizeof(struct netprio_map) + sizeof(u32) * (max_prioidx + 1),
>> so the size of array that map->priomap point to is max_prioidx +1,
>> which is low than what we actually need.
>>
>> fix this by adding check in get_prioidx,only set max_prioidx when
>> max_prioidx low than the new prioidx.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  net/core/netprio_cgroup.c |    3 ++-
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
>> index 5b8aa2f..586f7d9 100644
>> --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
>> +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
>> @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ static int get_prioidx(u32 *prio)
>>  	}
>>  	set_bit(prioidx, prioidx_map);
>>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prioidx_map_lock, flags);
>> -	atomic_set(&max_prioidx, prioidx);
>> +	if (atomic_read(&max_prioidx) < prioidx)
>> +		atomic_set(&max_prioidx, prioidx);
>>  	*prio = prioidx;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
> 
> This is still racy.
> 
> Please do this before the 
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prioidx_map_lock, flags);
> 

Thanks Eric,you are right
I will fix and resent it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/