| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:27:16 -0700 From: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux@...nhuawei.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Fix for leapsecond caused futex issue (v4) On 07/05/2012 07:41 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > I tested this patchset for ~22 hours without any issues using my own leap second > test code, John's previous leaptest.c and this new leap-a-day test with and > without the -s option. > > In all x86 systems' cases (both AMD and Intel, large cpu count[1] and small cpu > count) I also ran Firefox in the background and monitored it using top and > occasionally breaking in to check the status of the futexes. I haven't seen > anything wrong with any of the systems. > > John, my apologies for not getting to exactly 24 hours. I've usurped these > systems long enough and other people need them :/. I'm going to continue to run > two systems (one AMD and one Intel) for a longer stretch but I don't anticipate > any issues at this point. > > So ... > > Acked-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> > > For the entire patchset. Thanks so much! I greatly appreciate the extra testing and review you've provided! -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists