lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:27:10 +0930 From: Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 10:21:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > which have now been fixed. So would a simple patch that puts the > _savegpr etc functions in their own section (defined how?) fix this for > us? Ah, the kernel provides its own save/restore functions, and these get mashed into a .text containing normal functions with toc references by ld -r. Well, you could stop using ld -r. Otherwise, try .section ".text.save.restore","ax",@progbits -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists