linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] uprobes: write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Jul 2012 18:07:04 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] uprobes: write_opcode() cleanups

On 07/06, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > write_opcode() cleanups resend + new minor fix.
> >
> > Changes:
> >
> > 	- document the new argument in 2/5.
> >
> > 	- drop the buggy 5/5, thanks Anton for your quick nack.
> > 	  Probably I'll return to this later, I have another reason
> > 	  for this change.
> >
> > 	- so this 5/5 is new.
> >
> > Srikar, please add your acks unless you have some objections.
>
> Just wondering what's the review status of patches #1-#4?

I hope Srikar will ack 1-4 soon.

He observed the testing failures, but it turns out this series
is innocent.

I'll send more fixes soon.

> I'll skip #5 based on Oleg's request,

Yes, thanks. I still think 5/5 makes sense, but we need to do
something with uprobe.s:vma_address() first.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/