[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 01:45:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port
On Saturday 2012-07-07 21:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>On Saturday 07 July 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> > ARM introduced AArch64 as part of the ARMv8 architecture
>>
>> With the risk of bikeshedding here, but I find the name awkward. How
>> about just naming the arch port arm64 instead?
>
>I agree the name sucks, and I'd much prefer to just call it arm64 as
>well. The main advantage of the aarch64 name is that it's the same
>as the identifier in the elf triplet, [...] to identify the
>architecture, [...] the rpm and dpkg architecture names, and [...]
>the uname syscall.
Any hindrance changing the specs? There is not even arm64 hardware - or
aarch64, for that matter - out there yet according to the initial post,
so I doubt there is anything in userspace yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists