linux-kernel - Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:05:14 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	Keping Chen <chenkeping@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe
 ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com> wrote:
> Hi Bjorn and Yinghai,
>         What's the policy to export a symbol by EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? I know the legal difference, but don't
> know when I should mark a symbol as GPL.

>From Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl,

    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL implies that the function is considered
    an internal implementation issue, and not really an interface.

So I use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL unless I'm willing to support the symbol as
an interface indefinitely.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/