| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 22:31:14 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Defer failed gpio requests by default On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > Since users must be explicitly provided with a GPIO number in order to > request one the overwhelmingly common case for failing to request will > be that the required GPIO driver has not yet registered and we should > therefore defer until it has registered. > > In order to avoid having to code this logic in individual drivers have > gpio_request() return -EPROBE_DEFER when failing to look up the GPIO. > Drivers which don't want this behaviour can override it if they desire. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> While this makes perfect sense to me I would *really* like to wait for Grants opinion on this one patch, him having devised the deferral and being GPIO maintainer. Is any deferral of this deferral mechanism causing you to defer important work right now? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists