Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] shmem: fix negative rss in memcg memory.stat

When adding the page_private checks before calling shmem_replace_page(),
I did realize that there is a further race, but thought it too unlikely
to need a hurried fix.

But independently I've been chasing why a mem cgroup's memory.stat
sometimes shows negative rss after all tasks have gone: I expected it
to be a stats gathering bug, but actually it's shmem swapping's fault.

It's an old surprise, that when you lock_page(lookup_swap_cache(swap)),
the page may have been removed from swapcache before getting the lock; 
or it may have been freed and reused and be back in swapcache; and it
can even be using the same swap location as before (page_private same).

The swapoff case is already secure against this (swap cannot be reused
until the whole area has been swapped off, and a new swapped on); and
shmem_getpage_gfp() is protected by shmem_add_to_page_cache()'s check
for the expected radix_tree entry - but a little too late.

By that time, we might have already decided to shmem_replace_page():
I don't know of a problem from that, but I'd feel more at ease not to
do so spuriously.  And we have already done mem_cgroup_cache_charge(),
on perhaps the wrong mem cgroup: and this charge is not then undone on
the error path, because PageSwapCache ends up preventing that.

It's this last case which causes the occasional negative rss in
memory.stat: the page is charged here as cache, but (sometimes) found
to be anon when eventually it's uncharged - and in between, it's an
undeserved charge on the wrong memcg.

Fix this by adding an earlier check on the radix_tree entry: it's
inelegant to descend the tree twice, but swapping is not the fast path,
and a better solution would need a pair (try+commit) of memcg calls,
and a rework of shmem_replace_page() to keep out of the swapcache.

We can use the added shmem_confirm_swap() function to replace the
find_get_page+page_cache_release we were already doing on the error
path.  And add a comment on that -EEXIST: it seems a peculiar errno
to be using, but originates from its use in radix_tree_insert().

[It can be surprising to see positive rss left in a memcg's memory.stat
after all tasks have gone, since it is supposed to count anonymous but
not shmem.  Aside from sharing anon pages via fork with a task in some
other memcg, it often happens after swapping: because a swap page can't
be freed while under writeback, nor while locked.  So it's not an error,
and these residual pages are easily freed once pressure demands.]

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
---
I'd rather like this to go into v3.5, but it is late, and I don't have
a very strong argument for it: as you prefer.  And I've not marked it
for stable, since the patch won't apply to v3.4 as is; but I'd happily
supply a patch for v3.1 onwards if asked.

 mm/shmem.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- 3.5-rc6/mm/shmem.c	2012-07-07 19:20:02.986950655 -0700
+++ linux/mm/shmem.c	2012-07-07 19:20:52.026952048 -0700
@@ -264,6 +264,24 @@ static int shmem_radix_tree_replace(stru
 }
 
 /*
+ * Sometimes, before we decide whether to proceed or to fail, we must check
+ * that an entry was not already brought back from swap by a racing thread.
+ *
+ * Checking page is not enough: by the time a SwapCache page is locked, it
+ * might be reused, and again be SwapCache, using the same swap as before.
+ */
+static bool shmem_confirm_swap(struct address_space *mapping,
+			       pgoff_t index, swp_entry_t swap)
+{
+	void *item;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	item = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, index);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return item == swp_to_radix_entry(swap);
+}
+
+/*
  * Like add_to_page_cache_locked, but error if expected item has gone.
  */
 static int shmem_add_to_page_cache(struct page *page,
@@ -1124,9 +1142,9 @@ repeat:
 		/* We have to do this with page locked to prevent races */
 		lock_page(page);
 		if (!PageSwapCache(page) || page_private(page) != swap.val ||
-		    page->mapping) {
+		    !shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap)) {
 			error = -EEXIST;	/* try again */
-			goto failed;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 		if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
 			error = -EIO;
@@ -1142,9 +1160,12 @@ repeat:
 
 		error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge(page, current->mm,
 						gfp & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
-		if (!error)
+		if (!error) {
 			error = shmem_add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, index,
 						gfp, swp_to_radix_entry(swap));
+			/* We already confirmed swap, and make no allocation */
+			VM_BUG_ON(error);
+		}
 		if (error)
 			goto failed;
 
@@ -1245,14 +1266,10 @@ decused:
 unacct:
 	shmem_unacct_blocks(info->flags, 1);
 failed:
-	if (swap.val && error != -EINVAL) {
-		struct page *test = find_get_page(mapping, index);
-		if (test && !radix_tree_exceptional_entry(test))
-			page_cache_release(test);
-		/* Have another try if the entry has changed */
-		if (test != swp_to_radix_entry(swap))
-			error = -EEXIST;
-	}
+	if (swap.val && error != -EINVAL &&
+	    !shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap))
+		error = -EEXIST;
+unlock:
 	if (page) {
 		unlock_page(page);
 		page_cache_release(page);
@@ -1264,7 +1281,7 @@ failed:
 		spin_unlock(&info->lock);
 		goto repeat;
 	}
-	if (error == -EEXIST)
+	if (error == -EEXIST)	/* from above or from radix_tree_insert */
 		goto repeat;
 	return error;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists